Mr. Hooligannes:
I am really surprised at your post because I have never said that the Gallery module sucks, go ahead, show me the post. You should be very careful when putting words in other people's mouths, specially as an official member of a development team. In fact, show me (us) any of my posts where I use improper language or treat anybody disrespectfully, go ahead show me. You are not going to find it because it is not my style. Just like I'm doing now even when you are slandering me and attempting to publicly damage my reputation in this forum.
Enough about that, but with that said, I acknowledge that I have been respectfully increasing the tone of my posts, over a period of many months, because when people asks about the status of the Gallery Module, the posts go ignored, yes ignored, you just admitted it. Well, it apparently worked because finally, after you have been reading and ignoring all my posts for a long time, as well as those from others, you are responding.
You just vented in your post but it really says nothing about the status of the Gallery module progress or its future direction, my point exactly. You reiterate that it is Beta and that it should not be installed in production and then contradict yourself saying that questions are answered, oh yeah, but don't use it for real in a production site, what???
I have not submitted any new bugs because I have not found any new bugs, honestly, but I have run into the same bugs that have been found and documented for a long time. In fact, I have not posted an actual question about using the Gallery module for a long time. I have been posting questions about the status, just like other users, because I would like to see the module move forward or at least get out of Beta so that it can officially be used in production.
Regarding the fact that DNN and its modules are developed by volunteers, if I recall correctly I address that excuse, yes excuse, in one of the posts you read and ignored. If you run out of volunteers because life happens, I understand that (I have said this a million times) but why not post it in the Gallery module blog so that we know what to expect and we don't have to keep posting messages with increasing levels of frustration. I just checked the blogs, as of 4/18/07 at 12:10AM EDT, no official update in the Gallery module blog about the Gallery module status or future direction, again, exactly my point. I have also said before that if the module is not going to be supported any longer, say so, one way or the other, please communicate with your constituency. When was the last time anything was posted in the Gallery module blog, a year ago? I tried to check this but the Gallery module blog doesn't even seem to talk about the Gallery module any longer.
I think I also said in one of my posts that I was expecting the usual DNN is done by volunteers, life happens, etc. etc. and you should get involved argument. You know what, that does not work any longer. DNN is now a corporation with responsibilities, at least that is what I understand, that they want to be taken seriously. Well I do. FYI I am one of those that do a lot for DNN by evangelizing about it whenever I can. I recommended it and it is being used in an Intranet application for the U.S. Navy (a training and testing application if you must know), among other customers of mine. I have the right to ask, and maybe demand, an answer. Sincerely, if you cannot take the heat, then you should not volunteer your time.
And I will ask the same question again, what is the official status of the Gallery Module? And I am not asking about opinions or rants from team members with a lot of legal disclaimers. I, as well as many other loyal users of DNN would like to know the OFFICIAL status of the module.
Sincerely,
Carlos R. Rodriguez