Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeDevelopment and...Development and...DNN Platform (o...DNN Platform (o...Why System.Web.Extensions v.1.0.61025.0?Why System.Web.Extensions v.1.0.61025.0?
Previous
 
Next
New Post
5/8/2008 2:53 PM
 

I'm curious why the instructions from Michael Washington tell us to use the System.Web.Extensions v.1.0.61025.0 instead of 3.5.0.0?  I have some controls (Telerik) that I've been using with ASP.NET 2.0 but I'd like to roll into using 3.5 for everything now and if I switch to their 3.5 version it requires System.Web.Extensions 3.5.0.0 to be referenced.  I've changed it in my web.config to reflect that and it works now and nothing else seems to have broken, but just trying to get some reasoning here in case there was a real reason why he was targeting the older System.Web.Extensions.


-- Jon Seeley
DotNetNuke Modules
Custom DotNetNuke and .NET Development
http://www.seeleyware.com
 
New Post
5/21/2008 1:58 AM
 

At a guess michael may have been using a beta or rc version when that tutorial was created.

Im currently working in 2008 with the sp1 and .net 3.5sp1 beta and 3.5.0.0 works perfectly for all my testing.
<add assembly="System.Web.Extensions, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35"/>

Westa

 
New Post
5/21/2008 8:53 AM
 

I'm going to guess if you reference the 3.5.0 System.web.Extensions, your code will not work in sites running .net 2.0.

Although, I'm asleep at the moment and never tried..

 
New Post
5/21/2008 1:17 PM
 

I'm fine with it not working on older sites since this is for our corporate intranet and I have full control over that.  What is weird is once I changed the reference to 3.5, I am getting a warning that 'asp:ScriptManager' is ambiguous.  Please modify the associated registration that is causing ambiguity and pick a new tag prefix. (this on an ASPX page in my module).

So I can change the TagPrefix and get it to work, but I don't really see why it won't work with the "asp" TagPrefix like the 2.0 version did.  Ideas?

*EDIT* -- apparently I had a few UserControls that were specifically targeting that version and I hadn't removed that reference.  I also added the assemblyBinding section under runtime at the bottom of my webconfig to hopefully forward all others that I may have forgotten.  Seems to do the trick.


-- Jon Seeley
DotNetNuke Modules
Custom DotNetNuke and .NET Development
http://www.seeleyware.com
 
New Post
8/27/2008 6:07 PM
 

I found that switching the System.Web.Extensions version to 3.5.0.0 causes the Register button to stop working on an otherwise default install.     Not sure why yet - just thought I'd throw that out there.   Any ideas?    I'm on the new 3.5 SP1 framework, BTW

 

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDevelopment and...Development and...DNN Platform (o...DNN Platform (o...Why System.Web.Extensions v.1.0.61025.0?Why System.Web.Extensions v.1.0.61025.0?


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out