Hi everyone,

Am I missing something here?  I keep reading that the core DNN product is W3C compliant - that it is how you develop the application and what skins to use is where to be wary however, I have just installed a fresh DNN application (v4.9.0 - new one) and it fails on the W3C online tests for XHTML and CSS.  Only when I tinkered with the default.css did I managed to get it to pass the W3C online test for CSS.  I do not however, know how to get it to pass XHTML W3C online test.  Does anyone know what I need to do?  As W3C publishes standards that are global I would like to think that this is what all developers are striving for - not country specific compliance - this is so varied and would never therefore, be possible to have a truly globally compliant DNN application.

Hi

Well then I weould also like to vote for better semantic use. So stop putting the link module in a table but allow for unordered lists or datalist. Much easier to style also

Armand Datema

Get my new skin ( lots of design variations [18 headers, 30 titlebars, 30 breadcrumbs, 3 footers ], 50+ typography containers , 50+ page templates and an online theme builder for unlimited skin variations) Aura>

For all your skin conversions

2DNN

Follow me on Twitter