Hi Jeff.
Thank you for your reply.
At about 6 this morning, I completed a Flash, and inserted it.
The problem seems to have gone away, but, if all I had wanted was a table there, I would have been plenty perturbed.
Competitors? There should not be browser wars. What does MS care who's browser is being used, if it weren't for the information they get to sift out of surfers? Same goes for any of the others. As I said, Mozilla is extremely popular right now, and between MS and Adobe, I believe there is a big push to break Mozilla functionality, and get "market share" back. Anyone who seeks MS as a solution takes the risk of being corralled into solutions that aren't necessarily all that great. Almost everything a person would want to do on the web (functionality-wise) has been done, sometimes with very elegant solutions, and sometimes not. I mean, what the heck is wrong with JS, CGI, PHP and HTML? The "web" is being turned into a gigantic "Rube Goldberg Machine", and CMS's don't really simplify a whole lot for anyone, except a few very capable experts, who know the particular system, and can work with it, IMHO.
I have messed around with a few CMS's, and it seems they all have similar problems, forums full of help requests for quirky problems, a handful of die hard committed experts (thank god for them), and many unresolved issues. And DNN is up to 4.9 now?
I admit that to me, it's a bit of a quandry... I would like to see standardization at some point, but WHO'S!!!???
All these complicated new backend software solutions that require knowledge of fifteen different programming languages don't really help, and are not really a benefit to those who would like to use the power of the web for their own personal benefit and gain.
So, THERE! lol
Thanks again for the reply.
P.S. I began to supect that the problem was most likely a difference between the way MS and Mozilla render CSS, but, in a CMS, good luck finding out which file it is!