Slavic Kozyuk wrote
... the green hosting issue is a marketing gimmick in my opinion ...
Bottom line is, anyone can buy a $10K carbon offset credit and include it on the marketing info to justify higher costs for products and services. Yes, there are some companies that install solar panels or use geothermal cooling, but those are few and usually cannot provide the capacity necessary to accommodate the demand.
not sure how much further off track it's possible to be with the whole issue of green hosting
there are power companies in existence who source 100% of their energy from renewable sources - wind, hydro, solar, geothermal etc
so it's not actually that difficult to run a green hosting company - you minimise your use of technology, offset your purchases, and run your entire organisation on power from an accredited source
perhaps this is not the way things run in the USA - I don't know - but I'm pretty sure that most of the rest of the world has caught up with the idea that it is possible to purchase all of your energy requirements from renewable sources
i find that most of the objections to the issue of 'green hosting' come from hosting companies who are not prepared to shoulder the financial cost of redeploying their services in line with the basic principles of sustainability
also, i admit, it's a great deal easier for a relatively new company to come into the market as 'green' given that they are able to start from scratch
still, marketing gimmick or not, hosting companies ignore the clamour for green hosting at their peril
this response is certainly not leveled at the previous post, but more of a response borne of frustration with the cynicism of entrenched world views
and possibly not the right place to be making these remarks (although I am sure there can be nothing wrong with healthy debate about such things anywhere).