Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Performance and...Performance and...Performance problems after upgrade DNN 5.5.1Performance problems after upgrade DNN 5.5.1
Previous
 
Next
New Post
10/1/2010 4:35 PM
 
Store Integrator wrote:
Sebastian Leupold wrote:
AFTER you applied MS patch for the .Net vulnerability, you may revert changes in web.config. Please check, whether this helps with your situation. According to the blog post from Scott Gutthrie, users should clear site cookies, the MS patch affect encryption of the cookie

Hi,
I hope this is not the case. For marketing purposes you want to keep track of a visitor. The machinekeys and encryptionkeys are not changed. I am questioning if with this vulnerability you should not change any of chose. Assume those keys are intercepted and you apply all the patches MS recommends. Then I believe your site already have been compromised?

 you should never alter machine key or encryption key at all, but users may need to clear local browser cache and cookies for the site, if it is not already expired.


Cheers from Germany,
Sebastian Leupold

dnnWerk - The DotNetNuke Experts   German Spoken DotNetNuke User Group

Speed up your DNN Websites with TurboDNN
 
New Post
10/1/2010 4:40 PM
 
2GB for a dedicated Web server with SQL server installed is not best proportion, since OS claims a lot memory and SQL server 1-2 GB as well.

Cheers from Germany,
Sebastian Leupold

dnnWerk - The DotNetNuke Experts   German Spoken DotNetNuke User Group

Speed up your DNN Websites with TurboDNN
 
New Post
10/5/2010 4:18 AM
 
Hi,

I know it is useless discussion. I understand that more memory is more optimal. However, a PHP site with MySQL will run on a 1 GB box without any problems. For testing purposes we allocated 8 GB of memory to the VM. It seems that only the full text search is working better and returns faster its result. With 2 GB is sometimes times out. The overall memory consumption is the same and still there is a same page file. I would expect the OS to be smart and allocate most of the memory instead of going to page to disk. The overall site performance is the same and therefore do not understand why more memory is better? Additional 8 GB does not make a technical difference in terms of performance. So why pay for 8 GB of memory every month? I know that a separated SQL and IIS webserver make a difference in performance. However, if you combine both on one machine performance with tons of memory still performance is less. I do however not want to spend more money on a second box. The PHP/ MySQL architecture sample is quite painful.

J. 
 
New Post
10/6/2010 11:21 AM
 
Hi J, I found you machine specs interesting, I have a simular deicated server for one of our clients and the memory never seems to move above 50% (under 1GB, like your php structure), even during an early morning TV show where the site was featured. I do set all my caching to the file system, once having a bad experience with memory caching and machines crashing and such. But even with the 2GB machine, runnning SQL express and DNN on windows 2008, I never have experiance any kind of timeout! The load on the site is not big, but speed wise it's been fine. I did have the idea of moving the DB to another machine, like we run on all our other sites, but it's simply not been needed. Dave.
 
New Post
10/8/2010 1:45 AM
 
I've gotten some feedback from Chad, who believes his issue was not related to DNN5.5.1.  So with this information and the fact in testing I can't see any issues I'm going to make the jump and upgrade the site to DNN5.5.1 sometime next week.    If I find any issues then I'll post back, otherwise you can assume everything went OK.

Regards,
Dave.
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Performance and...Performance and...Performance problems after upgrade DNN 5.5.1Performance problems after upgrade DNN 5.5.1


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out