Hi cnurse,

I come off from a development company which does allot of DNN development, in fact as a main architect for dnn in my company I don’t see that we could use WSP approach with building modules ever, simply because it does not provide enough flexibility either with builds, deployment, speed of development or many other aspects - well that's my 2 cents, that's why I've developed the described method which covers most ground as I see.

As for core team, yes I would say that this project could be made available through main dnn site, but what I would like to avoid is the smothering of big project vs. small one. If we are going through the *official* channel, I would like that we have freedom to develop this as we see fit, and implement our best practices as according to our knowledge and experience, without much politcs- if we can make an arrangement like this, I think that core team involvement would be very much appreciated and the *official* channel can do us both good.

The BIG issue is how can you support people on Express at the same time and in the easiest way?

You can't use WAP on Express.  I personally got VS2005 Standard (although free and I gave the link already.. so no current obstacle) when I found out WAP was not supported.

I think developers are going to get VS2005 one way or another if they are actually doing development.   Why the focus on Express because it is free?  VS2003 was not free.  This thread says WAP with DNN 4.x..  that implies not Express.

Vladan .. you are not modifying the core correct?  What is there right now that I can test out?