Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeArchived Discus...Archived Discus...Developing Under Previous Versions of .NETDeveloping Under Previous Versions of .NETASP.Net 2.0ASP.Net 2.0Develop?Develop?
Previous
 
Next
New Post
11/14/2007 11:56 AM
 

I highly recommend using the WAP method.  I personally build all of my modules using WAP and C#.


-Mitchel Sellers
Microsoft MVP, ASPInsider, DNN MVP
CEO/Director of Development - IowaComputerGurus Inc.
LinkedIn Profile

Visit mitchelsellers.com for my mostly DNN Blog and support forum.

Visit IowaComputerGurus.com for free DNN Modules, DNN Performance Tips, DNN Consulting Quotes, and DNN Technical Support Services
 
New Post
11/14/2007 12:47 PM
 

Mitch, I am just curious, what do you think are the pros and cons of using the WAP method?

 
New Post
11/14/2007 2:27 PM
 

Rafe,

There are many items that can fall under that definition.  I am preparing a blog post on it that will be on my website in the next few days but below are a few things that I like about it.

-You have an individual solution for each module
-You can easily define the assembly name and have full control for compiled modules
-Checking projects into source control is easier
-You do not have to build the whole DNN solution to get a compiled assembly

THe only real con that I can think of is that you MUST have Visual Studio to develop with WAP you can't be using an express edition.


-Mitchel Sellers
Microsoft MVP, ASPInsider, DNN MVP
CEO/Director of Development - IowaComputerGurus Inc.
LinkedIn Profile

Visit mitchelsellers.com for my mostly DNN Blog and support forum.

Visit IowaComputerGurus.com for free DNN Modules, DNN Performance Tips, DNN Consulting Quotes, and DNN Technical Support Services
 
New Post
11/14/2007 5:21 PM
 

Mitch,

I'll be looking forward to that article. In the mean time I am going to make a serious attempt to try out this method. I tried it once before, but the tutorial I was using didn't cover certain gotchas when using C#. I think i had trouble clearing the namespace out on my project.

btw, can you still F5 to debug your module like in the std (WSP) method?

 
New Post
11/15/2007 10:10 AM
 

I am curious about the WAP method...

1. Are there any performance problems with teh WAP model? i.e. does the code compile at runtime?
2. Are there any resources for learning HOW to develop using the WAP model in regards to DNN?
3. Are there any debug considerations to using WAP model?

Thanks for your time...

Also how come I NEVER get email when this forum updates even though I have selected notification?

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeArchived Discus...Archived Discus...Developing Under Previous Versions of .NETDeveloping Under Previous Versions of .NETASP.Net 2.0ASP.Net 2.0Develop?Develop?


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out