Benoît ,

As much as I would like to make it easy on myself, I would be reluctant to make breaking changes for others when modifying the resource files seems straightforward. But I am only one opinion and agree that it is a good idea to get feedback from others -- I will start a new thread to see what others have to say.

Regarding changing the resource file for Gilles, I don't mind making changes but have two questions:

1. Can I use 02.01.46 as the base for changes? (I am not able to use release 02.01.47 because the store admin will not display correctly - Gilles is aware of the issue and said a fix is on the way).

2. How do I transmit the updated resources files?

Don

Changing names in the database can be a breaking change for those who wrote custom procedure, but changing names in the resources file is not a breaking change - just a change!

Anyway, changes can be unconfortable and people will appreciate if there is a debate - and hopefully a concensus, before any action is taken.

You might explain the idea behind your proposals: that new wording covers a wider range of use case than the current one, and that those who submit other terms should take this constraint into consideration.

We might pinpost the thread with your proposals and call for comments during a certain period of time. We will also tell people in advance what changes will make it into the 2011 releases, so they can prepare their alternate resource files if needed.

---

Benoît Sarton
www.bsi.fr
www.dotnetnuke.fr

Hi Gilles,

I am using version 5.6.0 of both the professional and community DNN. I appreciate your help.

Don