>> I also believe that the participation here is severly stiffled because of the moderation imposed.
I do not believe that participation is "stiffled" (sic) because of the moderation imposed. Either way, there is no factual basis to prove or disprove the premise. The only way to do it would be to turn off moderation and that is not going to happen.
>> The main argument from those in control is that they do not want spam in the forums.
That is not the main argument, it is merely a goal which appears to have been achieved on an ongoing basis since most spam is moderated out. Spam in the general sense is not the only problem moderation addresses. There are posts made to the wrong forum, posts with excessive commercial messaging, posts that are not in accordance with the forums guidelines, posts that cross the line of civil conversation, posts that are disruptive to the community...the list goes on. For any online community forums with a large number of members, there has to be a filter to ensure that chaos does not ensue. The site quoted earlier is a great example. Dpreview.com does not have moderation, but it has a pretty good up-front filter...you cannot register with a public email address (i.e. you must have a private domain email or ISP email). This is an up-front deterrent as anonymity is no longer guaranteed.
Different communities choose different ways to protect their community forums. We have chosen moderation because it's effective and works for these forums.
Nik