Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeArchived Discus...Archived Discus...Developing Under Previous Versions of .NETDeveloping Under Previous Versions of .NETASP.Net 2.0ASP.Net 2.0Have I been ripped off?Have I been ripped off?
Previous
 
Next
New Post
7/26/2007 4:47 PM
 

Please do not hijack posts and only post in a single thread.


Do you know the truth when you hear it?
Néstor Sánchez
The Dúnadan Raptor -->Follow Me on Twitter Now!
 
New Post
7/29/2007 11:38 PM
 

It seems you are possibly not understanding how most modules are actually packaged.

Without seeing the actually source code
- but at a pretty fair guess
 - this module will most like have been built as a seperate stand alone project called a WAP.

When you build a module this way - all of the SOURCE CODE is compiled into a .dll file that gets installed in the websites BIN folder.

As such - you could change all the  source code you like - but the website will never run the uncompiled source code since
it will be finding the compiled .dll code before it ever gets the chance to recompile your modified source code.

Westa

 

 

 
New Post
7/30/2007 5:33 AM
 
Exactly! Compare this to the "Survey" module for instance. You edit the source code, re-compile, and it updates the dll. This "source code" module i bought does not. Firstly it compiles to some weird temporary folder in my windows directory. secondly, even though it's compiled, nothing has changed in the dll. none of the changes made to the source code files take affect.
 
New Post
8/3/2007 12:42 PM
 

You have what you need to compile and make changes.

What is in the source package is a .sln file for the solution and a .csproj . You will want to open the kbdnn into visual studio using one of these 2 files. These files include what is needed for you to compile the changes.

There is still one more step....after you compile you must take the dlls that are in the bin folder of kbdnn and move them out into the bin folder of dotnetnuke so that your dotnetnuke portal can use the new updated dll's to run off of.

Now you can see your changes.

 
New Post
8/6/2007 12:46 AM
 
Yes, thanks I know. It does not do that.
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeArchived Discus...Archived Discus...Developing Under Previous Versions of .NETDeveloping Under Previous Versions of .NETASP.Net 2.0ASP.Net 2.0Have I been ripped off?Have I been ripped off?


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out