Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Administration ...Administration ...Dotnetnuke - w3c complianceDotnetnuke - w3c compliance
Previous
 
Next
New Post
11/1/2007 3:24 AM
 

Well her int he Netherlands for Dutch government projects its a guideline

As of 1 September last year, every website built for a government agency is required by law to use:

  • valid HTML 4.01 or XHTML 1.0
  • CSS and semantic HTML and separation of structure and presentation
  • progressive enhancement
  • the W3C DOM (instead of the old Microsoft document.all)
  • meaningful values of class and id
  • meaningful alt attributes on all image

and thats not everything they go even further

Furthermore:

  • scripts that work on links should extend the basic link functionality (think accessible popups)
  • if a link makes no sense without a script, it shouldn't be in the HTML (but be generated by JavaScript)
  • use of forms or scripts as the only means of getting certain information is prohibited
  • removing the focus rectangle on links is prohibited
  • information offered in a closed format (think Word) should also be offered in an open format
  • the semantics of many HTML elements are explicitly defined ( meaning a lot of unordered lists,  paragraphs and only tables for tabualr display of data )

You can read (in Dutch) here

http://webrichtlijnen.overheid.nl/besluit/tekst-besluit-en-toelichting/

The go very far in this and a DNN site out of the box without any modification doenst comply to a lot of the rules for validity, acessibillity and semantically correct use of html

 

 

 
New Post
11/1/2007 9:02 AM
 

I agree.  Having worked in the government, the ONLY true REQUIREMENT was Section 508 compliance.  While I have not seen any web site offer 100% Section 508 compliance, I must say that DNN made it easier for me to get there.  And that was managing 42 government web sites (all DNN) at once. 


Will Strohl

Upendo Ventures Upendo Ventures
DNN experts since 2003
Official provider of the Hotcakes Commerce Cloud and SLA support
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Administration ...Administration ...Dotnetnuke - w3c complianceDotnetnuke - w3c compliance


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out