Jeff Cochran wrote
Technically they're not portals with separate databases, they're completely separate DNN installations. And many clients will want this rather than a database shared with others.
Jeff
Yes, I imagine that they will.
What, then is the real point of the ability to create multiple portals, if they all reside within the same database?
I initially saw the multiple portals as a great way to create multiple websites, each mapping onto a different portal. Each with its own domain name, skin and representing a unique business idea. But perhaps that is not the intention?
I can't help feeling it would have been a nice move to separate the host (SuperUser) and admin (for each portal) at the database level. So the main database you create when you install DNN becomes a host database containing perhaps a list of portals each of which has a separate database with its own customers. I imagine that the project has progressed too far for this to be possible now.
I'm new to DNN and don't intend to be too critical of it, since I'm still learning how it works. It's a remarkable peice of work and hats off to Shaun Walker and his team for their achievement. It's just that I'm a little uneasy about combining customers for different businesses in the same database (and the same tables, presumably). How would one move a site to another hosting company, for example - or to a dedicated server if the site became popular - if it was inextricably mixed up with all the other sites, being one of several portals in a single DNN installation?
I take your point that it's possible to install separate DNN's for each site, but then the advantage of being able to create and manage multiple portals looks more like unecessary overhead rather than a big advantage.