Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeDNN Open Source...DNN Open Source...Provider and Extension ForumsProvider and Extension ForumsFCKeditorFCKeditorFCK Editor in Google ChromeFCK Editor in Google Chrome
Previous
 
Next
New Post
9/2/2008 4:52 PM
 

 This is rather interesting.  I came to this forum to post that the FCKEditor isn't rendering for my DNN sites when they're being viewed with Google Chrome, but as I write this post, I see it works here.

Has anyone else had a similar experience?

 
New Post
9/2/2008 5:43 PM
 

AFAIK the 4.9 RC1 version we're dogfooding here contains an updated version of fckeditor that works with google chrome , whereas the old one does not for some reason - this is likely to be due to some incompability or non-standard code that google chrome has problems with (it is it's first release and in their blog post they noted that they're only getting 99% coverage of the million of so test sites they used - and as none of these sites have log in's I would suspect that none had a public fckeditor available). I'm guessing that due to fck's popularity, google will notice this lapse and fix it in a future release.

Cathal


Buy the new Professional DNN7: Open Source .NET CMS Platform book Amazon US
 
New Post
9/3/2008 8:41 AM
 

 While I would think it would be easier for Google to "fix" their browser to render the editor, I though the problem was with non-standard or non-compliant code in the fckEditor?  If that's true, I would think that web browser manufacturers should have to do nothing.  Just my 2 cents...  However, I see that fckEditor version 2.00.02 renders just fine.  According to Joe Brinkman, it should pass through the release tracker any day now:

http://www.dotnetnuke.com/Community/Forums/tabid/795/forumid/118/postid/252808/scope/posts/Default.aspx


Will Strohl

Upendo Ventures Upendo Ventures
DNN experts since 2003
Official provider of the Hotcakes Commerce Cloud and SLA support
 
New Post
9/3/2008 11:53 AM
 

actually as google wrote their own js processor (v8) it's as likely that the issue is their parser as in existing javascript. Considering that fck works on IE and firefox which have well over 95% of the market that makes them the defacto standard so any new browser should support javascript supported by those 2 or else support an ECMA standard, and not some arbitrary set of js. Anyway, it doesn't really matter as the new fckeditor release, along with 4.9 which contains it will be out soon.

Cathal


Buy the new Professional DNN7: Open Source .NET CMS Platform book Amazon US
 
New Post
9/4/2008 9:11 AM
 

cathal connolly wrote

... that makes them the defacto standard so any new browser should support javascript supported by those 2 ...

 

Does this mean, because of the reason that the Toyota Corolla is the most sold car in the world, it is defacto the standard for passenger cars? bah! ;)

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDNN Open Source...DNN Open Source...Provider and Extension ForumsProvider and Extension ForumsFCKeditorFCKeditorFCK Editor in Google ChromeFCK Editor in Google Chrome


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out