Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...Are iframes inherently insecure?Are iframes inherently insecure?
Previous
 
Next
New Post
9/17/2009 9:44 PM
 

I'm a relative newbie with DotNetNuke (although not with the web in general), and am involved with an implementation project that includes someone with more DNN experience than me. We have an application we want to offer on the site which we do not have time to port to the new environment but which runs just fine on the old site. Although it would not be my first choice of how to do it, it seems to me that a reasonable quick solution would be to add an iframe inside an html module on the new site and access the application on the old site through it. The other guy says it should be absolutely forbidden to do that, that is poses grave security risks, but can't tell me why.

I googled the situation, and did find a reference to a cross-site scripting exploit a few years back that applied to the DotNetNuke iframe module (which I am not proposing we use) and which was patched.  Is there really a security risk here if we do what I propose?

By the way, the application we are hosting in the iframe does not require a login or use sessions. It is a collection of a few php driven forms with some spry javascript validation routines built in that does some database interaction and send some emails about the transactions. A little too complicated for some of the DNN forms modules and not quite complicated enough for developing a standalone module (and we are on a deadline, so a quick and temporary solution would probably be acceptible).

Any suggestions about the level of risk, and links to specific info if there is a risk, would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Barry

 
New Post
9/18/2009 6:09 PM
 

If "does not require a login or use sessions" is true, then I'd also like to know what the grave security risks are?

Maybe it's a grave JOB security risk for the "other guy" :-).


Eric Swanzey
www.swanzey.com
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...Are iframes inherently insecure?Are iframes inherently insecure?


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out