Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Performance and...Performance and...Page Speed result comparison - 4.9.5 to 5.4.4Page Speed result comparison - 4.9.5 to 5.4.4
Previous
 
Next
New Post
8/19/2010 9:13 AM
 
Well... this is certainly interesting. I've done a quick trial upgrade of a backup copy of my 5.4.4 system and find that there's something wrong with 5.5

Just comparing the same page as in my first post, but not measuring load times as it's not comparable at the moment.

5.5.0 (compared with 5.4.4)
Score 70 (down 4)
31 resources (up 1)
662kb uncompressed (up heaps!)
178kb compressed

Obviously something's terribly wrong here, and it looks to me to be a 300Kb script file called "MicrosoftAjax.debug.js"

Did someone forget something when this was packaged?

Can someone else check theirs and confirm if they're seeing the same thing?
Rob




 
New Post
8/19/2010 6:17 PM
 
AFAIR if you're running in debug mode then MS Ajax emits microsoftajax.debug.js (which is essentially a larger, nicely formatted version of microsoftajax.js), so please check you have debug set to false. AFAIR this can also happen if any scriptmanger has the ScriptMode attribute set to True (DotNetNuke does not set this, and it defaults to false)

Buy the new Professional DNN7: Open Source .NET CMS Platform book Amazon US
 
New Post
8/19/2010 7:12 PM
 
Aha got it... I see debgug=true in the compliation section. I had created this test instance yesterday to demonstrate bugs to a couple of module developers, and one of them must have enabled that when checking. Another lesson learned.

So, I re-did the test with that disabled and as expected, the result is identical to 5.4.4

I'll enable human friendly URLs later today, but that's unlikely to change the result.

Again.. the only point being made here is that some upgraders may want to spend some time tweaking things to counter the effects of the extra load.
Rob
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Performance and...Performance and...Page Speed result comparison - 4.9.5 to 5.4.4Page Speed result comparison - 4.9.5 to 5.4.4


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out