Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeDevelopment and...Development and...DNN Platform (o...DNN Platform (o...Module load performance decrease in 6.1Module load performance decrease in 6.1
Previous
 
Next
New Post
11/19/2011 5:08 AM
 

Hi all,

I am implementing a business application as DNN module. As I this would be an intensive working application maximal performance would be needed / expected.

For in module navigation I am using dynamic load of control. (http://woaychee.wordpress.com/2008/12...)

At first I used DNN 6.0 and the processing time on the server is approximately 500 ms (DB access takes 1-2 ms).

Then I upgraded to DNN 6.1 and processing time raised up to 900 ms ;(

Now I downgraded to DNN 6.0 and “displayed” an empty page and the processing time is 250 ms.

I am quite surprised that performance was so degraded from version 6.0 to 6.1.

There is any way speed up DNN 6.1? Maybe to turn off some unneeded features. It could be done declaratively or in DNN core.

I notice too that when I turned on in memory “Page State” the processing time decreased from 500 ms to less than 400 ms. Maybe something could be done here??

Thank you,

Kristijan

 
New Post
11/19/2011 8:31 AM
 
Moving ViewState into Memory disabled access for client component and some AJAX features.
I am not aware of changes affecting performance, maybe you are able to use fiddler to track down, which elements extend performance - or does this happen on the server side?

Cheers from Germany,
Sebastian Leupold

dnnWerk - The DotNetNuke Experts   German Spoken DotNetNuke User Group

Speed up your DNN Websites with TurboDNN
 
New Post
11/19/2011 10:01 AM
 
I would not expect the server-side code to change that much, perhaps it's a client change - i recommend installing a http proxy such as fiddler or installing firebug (for firefox or chrome) and checking to see the timeline to determine if it is an additional css/js/image that is causing the slowdown.

Buy the new Professional DNN7: Open Source .NET CMS Platform book Amazon US
 
New Post
11/21/2011 7:30 AM
 

At first thank you both for your answers.

I am lucky and now Ajax feature I am using failed because using in Memory viewstate. 

About the performance degradation I still do not believe that could be so bad…?! The times above were showed on my local PC using Chrome “Firebug – or how it is called” under tab “Netork” as Waiting (among Blocking, Sending, Waiting, Receiving), and I interpreted them as server processing time. I can not see what else could it be.

Regards, 

Kristjian

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDevelopment and...Development and...DNN Platform (o...DNN Platform (o...Module load performance decrease in 6.1Module load performance decrease in 6.1


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out