You've got me.  All the actual official information would come from Chris.  I can say we are gathering requirments and planing it out right now though and there are more people working on it now than ever before. 6 instead of just Chris.  I know that I plan to commit as many cycles as I can to getting a bug free version out.  Since one of my commitments at work is administration and development of the DNN website I can take whole work days to work on code for the Gallery.  That should help.

The communication now is almost a month old but it's the same problem. I'm working now on DNN 4.5.1 systems and we're using the module. When we get a new DNN release we must convert the gallery code to vs2005, sometimes we must change the code and last but not least writing a new package for a proper installation. 
We've a german translation for the 3.0.12 and we intend independently of the state of the project now to share resource for the community but the project seems for me much more than uncertain. 

So we really invest a lot of time to integrate that module but we've no chance to efficient develop with this module on modern DNN releases (at least there should be a VS2005 source edition with DNN 4.5).
Please could the project leaders frankly says us for the state of the project:
 It's now a living project and worth investing our time on the gallery or must we look for alternatives regarding the future DNN releases (compatibility)?