Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...Give me DotNetNuke Hosting recommendationGive me DotNetNuke Hosting recommendation
Previous
 
Next
New Post
4/6/2015 1:14 PM
 
Barry Turney wrote:

I can tell from experience DO NOT use Windows Azure to host DNN... we are actually in the process of reverting our production instance off of the DNN Cloud Services (which was drive by Windows Azure) because the performance is HORRIBLE.  We have struggled with it for almost 2 years with DNN making tweaks here and there to try to help it.. nothing we did worked... plus, on this platform... if  we made any configuration changes or installed a new module... the site would have to restart... and it would take 30-45 minutes for the site to become responsive again.  Needless to say avoid the DNN Cloud offering all together.. 

We are reverting install back over to a RackSpace server... which with our testing seems to be performing really well... 

 

Barry the issues you had must have been specific to the DNN Cloud Services and the requirements of your site, I have been installing and working with sites on Azure VM servers for a few years now and the only time I see performance problems is if the sites are on Test Level servers (A0 servers).  

I have worked with sites that take an hour to restart. Those issues are usually caused by large DNN installations that require custom performance settings in the web.config and the IIS App pools.  It can also be caused by too many site restarts with a bad configuration that can lead to multiple versions of assemblies in the ASP.Net cache.   After a few web.config setting changes, IIS app pool configurations and adding a batch or PS script to clear the ASP.Net cache out every night you should see those issues go away.

 



Professional DNN Extensions, custom solutions and mobile apps since 2003.
www.OnyakTech.com
 
New Post
4/6/2015 1:37 PM
 
Chris Onyak wrote:
Barry the issues you had must have been specific to the DNN Cloud Services and the requirements of your site, I have been installing and working with sites on Azure VM servers for a few years now and the only time I see performance problems is if the sites are on Test Level servers (A0 servers).  

I have worked with sites that take an hour to restart. Those issues are usually caused by large DNN installations that require custom performance settings in the web.config and the IIS App pools.  It can also be caused by too many site restarts with a bad configuration that can lead to multiple versions of assemblies in the ASP.Net cache.   After a few web.config setting changes, IIS app pool configurations and adding a batch or PS script to clear the ASP.Net cache out every night you should see those issues go away.

 

It may very well have been specific to the DNN Cloud Services.. we had absolutely no control of the app pool configuration... when it comes to restarting... the 30-45 minute restart time was exclusive to the DNN instance running in the DNN Cloud Services... our dev/testing box runs on a VM in our local cluster and when we have to load a new module to that instance it restarts in a matter of 10-15 seconds... you hardly know  it restarted... and we get the same experience when restarting on the RackSpace server...  DNN has in fact ditched the Cloud instance that we were initially on (I assume because they have figured out it wasn't a great solution) and they now offer a DNN OnDemand service... which is supposed to allocate additional resources as needed... I did some cursory testing of that offering as well.. and really didn't see any performance improvements with that offering either...  that's why we just decided to go with RackSpace.  

The performance issues we had with the DNN Cloud Services offering wasn't just with the restarting of the site.  We purchased their Evoq Social module last year and had to cancel our plans to roll it out in our site because the page load performance was so bad (it would take 6-10 seconds to load a page). 

 
New Post
6/22/2015 4:10 AM
 
There are so many companies that provide solid inexpensive web hosting with great service, I recommend: http://Hostforlife.eu DNN hosting.
The real difference comes if you need a specific feature, or if you need a certain type of support or so on. But generally you will be happy if you pick a large host that has 24/7 support and a good reputation like that hosting company.
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...Give me DotNetNuke Hosting recommendationGive me DotNetNuke Hosting recommendation


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out