I agree you can just put together a site and let it evolve but at some point this is going to become a big issue for DNN unless it is addressed. Although at the time of writing, no-one has been sued under UK law. This does not mean that a case will not be forthcoming. A visually impaired Australian man successfully sued the organisers of the Sydney Olympics because their web site was not accessible to him - and since Australian law is not dissimilar to our own, it is surely only a matter of time. This happens in the UK there are going to be a lot of site refreshes needed, whether they are using DNN or not. I have produce a lot of site in ASP.net and other technologies but we switch about 18 months ago to CSS only implementation. I think DNN is great and could really speed up creating web sites. However I'm concerned that unless the modules are change to use CSS only for layout then it could become a dead end.

When we first switched to CSS only implemenation it was really hard but I would not go back now. It is so much easier to refresh a site that has been done in pure CSS. I think DNN will have to move to CSS only and solve all the problems this entails.

Interestingly if you look at Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 and Microsoft Office SharePonit Serve it is possible to produce pure CSS only sites with these. So it can be done. The question is whether the DNN comunity is up for the challenge