Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeGetting StartedGetting StartedInstalling DNN ...Installing DNN ...Separate Installation-Only Connection StringSeparate Installation-Only Connection String
Previous
 
Next
New Post
11/28/2007 5:52 AM
 

I think I've seen somewhere that DNN 4.7 supports the use of two separate sets of connection information; one that is used for normal day to day access and one that is used to install modules (which needs higher rights in the database).

We are trying to harden DNN as far as possible and one of things I've done is create a database user with rights to execute all the SPs/UDFs etc. and select on all the views, which I will be using for every day operation. However obviously this user account has insufficient rights to create new database objects, a requirement for installation of additional modules. I would like, in our development environment only, to test out the concept of elevated privileges for installation of new modules. Can anyone help me on how to configure the second set of connection information? I thought it was something like an attribute in the string called installConnectionString but a Google has revealed nothing.

Please note that I am NOT referring to the old and new style connection strings maintained in the .config file. I fully understand that the ASP.NET 2.0 connection string is now used for most core stuff and the other kept for backwards compatibility with modules. I am an experienced developer and my question is not an everyday one. Instead it revolves around the system's ability to SWITCH ACCOUNTS so that installation of modules takes place under a database account with elevated privileges. This is something most users (95%+) will not bother to do, but which would (given sufficient experience and access to separate environments) provide significant hardening of database security.

 
New Post
6/5/2008 9:38 AM
 

I eventually managed to find the solution myself; as you can see from the dates it took a while! See

http://www.dotnetnuke.com/Community/Blogs/tabid/825/EntryID/1044/Default.aspx for details.

Hope this helps someone else.

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeGetting StartedGetting StartedInstalling DNN ...Installing DNN ...Separate Installation-Only Connection StringSeparate Installation-Only Connection String


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out