Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Administration ...Administration ...IIS Compression vs DNN CompressionIIS Compression vs DNN Compression
Previous
 
Next
New Post
1/28/2007 3:10 PM
 

toptalent wrote
So if I have control over IIS (am on dedicated server) and can configure the compression (file types etc) properly, it should be more efficient than the DNN compression? Am I likely to run into any compatibility issues?

Yes, and Yes.

But you should be able to overcome any issues since you have full control.


DotNetNuke Modules from Snapsis.com
 
New Post
1/28/2007 9:30 PM
 

John Mitchell wrote
You can use a tool like
this one, or Fiddler to check your page and see which one gives better results.

Thanks for the info John,

Now, that page for checking compression is way cool

That's the first time I've been able to see what's really happening. I threw my biggest homepage at it with Deflate set to 5 the size came from 65kb down to 18kb - -71% compression. That's massive! Another homepage went from 54kb to 22kb - 60% compression.

I'm betting that whitespace will make up a fair bit of the slack, but I keep that on for modules that have trouble with it.

I'm betting a lot o

 
New Post
1/28/2007 10:42 PM
 

 

Yes, those are normal compression ratios with text/html.  So did you get better compression with Deflate or Gzip?  Pretty close to the same?

You can do your own checking, but what you will find is that adding whitespace removal does not reduce the size that much more.
This is because compression of white space is a good white space remover all by itself.  Having whitspace can actually help the compression algorithm.


DotNetNuke Modules from Snapsis.com
 
New Post
1/28/2007 11:29 PM
 

I had just then set it all  up according to the settings declic was reporting were working in the other thread. It was working for me as well so I left it as-is. .. that being Deflate at 5. Turned out I'd also enabled the Whitespace filter beforehand, so everything was on.

I'll go and report it's working in the other thread. If it starts working properly with both compression types in 442 then I'll run some tests with them to see which is best.

 
New Post
1/29/2007 2:38 AM
 

Hi,

I had about 4-5% better compression without the whitespace filter, and experienced no difference between gzip and deflate. The total compression varies between 75% and 85%.

/Steinar

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Administration ...Administration ...IIS Compression vs DNN CompressionIIS Compression vs DNN Compression


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out