Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Administration ...Administration ...IIS Compression vs DNN CompressionIIS Compression vs DNN Compression
Previous
 
Next
New Post
1/27/2007 6:38 AM
 

Which one is better? Compatibility wise? Speed wise? Bug wise?

 
New Post
1/27/2007 9:58 AM
 

IIS compression is more efficient because it is done at a lower level inside IIS.

But most people on shared hosting do not have access to the IIS settings, and compression requires fine tuning to insure that your apps are working, so for usability it is often more practical to apply compression at the application level.


DotNetNuke Modules from Snapsis.com
 
New Post
1/28/2007 5:38 AM
 
So if I have control over IIS (am on dedicated server) and can configure the compression (file types etc) properly, it should be more efficient than the DNN compression? Am I likely to run into any compatibility issues?
 
New Post
1/28/2007 6:57 AM
 

So.. the type called Deflate Compression that is next to Gzip in the DNN host settings... is that IIS compression?

And if one selects Deflate Compression and it doesn't give any errors... will that mean it's likely to be working - or is a failure invisble when one doesn't have acccess to IIS Compression on a shared environment?

And if is working, then what should one set as the compression level in the same host settings.. it goes from 1-10 or 0-10 (I can't check now.. in middle of upgrading)

And also (see how much useful info one could write up for those little blue help icons), What number implies more compression (more cpu)... 1 or 10.. I'd guess 10, but who can tell. And in any case, what would be typical or comparable to the supplied Gzip compression... 5?

Thanks for any further info on these things,

Rob

 
New Post
1/28/2007 10:03 AM
 

Gzip and Deflate are just two different compression algorithms. 

You can use a tool like this one, or Fiddler to check your page and see which one gives better results.

The higher the number, the more CPU it takes to try and compress it more, but going above 5 or 6 is not going to give you that much more and will probably end up taking longer to compress then the time saved sending.


DotNetNuke Modules from Snapsis.com
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Administration ...Administration ...IIS Compression vs DNN CompressionIIS Compression vs DNN Compression


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out