Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Administration ...Administration ...Bugs on the File Manager (some are big ones, and reported months ago)Bugs on the File Manager (some are big ones, and reported months ago)
Previous
 
Next
New Post
11/23/2011 7:28 AM
 

Hello,

I'm worried about some bugs on the File Manager. Some were introduced on DNN 6.1.0, others are there since 6.0.0, and one exists since DNN 4 or even before that.

I've posted them (some, month ago) at http://support.dotnetnuke.com, and they are not even read or 'verified'. 

The worst ones are:  

This one is new to  6.1.0:

 http://support.dotnetnuke.com/issue/ViewIssue.aspx?id=18830&PROJID=2 

These are present since  6.0.0:

http://support.dotnetnuke.com/issue/ViewIssue.aspx?id=17836&PROJID=2 

http://support.dotnetnuke.com/issue/ViewIssue.aspx?id=17696&PROJID=2

http://support.dotnetnuke.com/issue/ViewIssue.aspx?id=17691&PROJID=2 


DNN-18830 makes the File Manager unusable (very slow), and it is very easy to fix.

DNN-17836 makes slow and inefficient all sync operations, and it is very easy to fix.

DNN-17696 confuses people, because they do not found files that are there (because the permissions are wrong)

DNN-17691 is there since DNN4 (or even before), and it affects any file (which is not an image) that is updated. 

For example, if you have a ZIP or PDF already uploaded, and you update it. Its size (in the Files table) is never updated. Therefore downloading it with many modules turns into a corrupted download. 

This is also very easy to fix.


Complete list:

My question is, will the ugliest bugs in this list be fixed soon? Or at least validated/recognized as bugs, and have a ETA to be solved? 

Or should I create a custom File Manager module to overcome them? This sounds like a waste of time, but, if there is no choice...

Thanks,

Horacio.-




 
New Post
11/23/2011 1:44 PM
 

If you believe these are easy to fix the best thing you can do is determine the fix, add it to the issue and set the "includes code fix" checkbox - this typically escalates the likelyhood of a fix being made in the next available version.

As to why this have not been triaged, the fact is that there are other more pressing items on our plate and we will get to these when we have time. It's always difficult to balance what to address first so we look at the priority and severity but also look at the reach of these issues e.g. in the majority of cases these are issues that only affect users of custom folder providers which were only recently introduced and are not in widespread use so other issues that affect all users have precedence currently (obviously as a vendor of folder providers you will disagree with this but we have to try to balance our limited resources - this is why contributing fixes is an excellent way to escalate their rate of changes)


Buy the new Professional DNN7: Open Source .NET CMS Platform book Amazon US
 
New Post
11/23/2011 2:33 PM
 
Actually, some of the issues includes code references...
Anyway, where can I get the latest source code to work with? (the public 6.1.1 code should not be it)
 
New Post
11/23/2011 7:15 PM
 
the easiest thing to do is to work against the latest release e.g. 6.1.2, however you can get nightly builds at http://dotnetnuke.codeplex.com/SourceControl/list/changesets . Please note, none of those tickets have "includes code fix" checked so they will not show up as having a fix when the reports are run.

Buy the new Professional DNN7: Open Source .NET CMS Platform book Amazon US
 
New Post
11/28/2011 1:05 PM
 
I would argue that anything that makes the file manager unusable isn't exactly a low priority fix. File manager is an essential tool. What some may have missed from the posts is that the quick workaround is to turn off auto-sync. While this may present some concurrency issues it does restore file manager instantly to usability in 6.x . While I applaud the idea of an "easy" fix, I suspect it's a little more complex. The meta data is needed only from certain files, and the best fix would be to create a list of valid extensions to load the file data from, and then to design a caching method so it's not reloaded unless the file is changed. That presents all sorts of interesting challenges none of which fall into the category of "easy" if I know my coding.... :)
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Administration ...Administration ...Bugs on the File Manager (some are big ones, and reported months ago)Bugs on the File Manager (some are big ones, and reported months ago)


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out