Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...wikipedia.org: Criticismswikipedia.org: Criticisms
Previous
 
Next
New Post
6/20/2006 1:10 PM
 

lmtsypin, there are a number of posts on pure CSS DNN sites, and several tutorials.  Some are even offered for free - so your post is confusing.  I too would prefer pure CSS sans-tables, but in the cost/benefit of where I spend my time - it's on functionality first.  I'm sure that's the core team focus as well. 

Why is it significantly wrong to use tables anyway?  It's not the best or cleanest, but it works.  Perhaps you should propose to join the CT and develop that solution towards CSS and compliance. 

 
New Post
6/20/2006 4:41 PM
 
If you're comparing DNN to using plain HTML, that wikipedia criticism seems valid, right?

EVERY portal has this problem. You cannot possibly create an efficient DIV/CSS website without knowing the content before hand. You're going to at least have redundant code and javascript tricks for all the different browsers, and also lots of nested DIV's.

Since DIV's align to each other, you're going to have major problems using 3rd party modules who cannot possibly know your design scheme.

Also, I can only imagine how many Admin features would break if you start letting users define the DocType. The only way to solve this is to get rid of SOLPART menus and all the rest of the fancy GUI.

I just think people aren't seeing the big picture. Maybe in 5 years it will be different, but right now we aren't really building webpages, we're building applications for IE, Netscape, Mozilla, and Safari. That's the sad truth. ;)

Jason Honingford - Web & Software Developer
www.PortVista.com
 
New Post
6/20/2006 4:51 PM
 

DIVitis is a contagious disease

I personally do all my skins with DIV's and my modules with tables.

On a slow site this has the advantage of loading module by module just like a pure DIV/CSS design and you can keep the advantage (read: easyness) of aligning controls with tables


Edit your Skin.xml and Container.xml files with:
Yannick's SXE
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...wikipedia.org: Criticismswikipedia.org: Criticisms


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out