Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeDevelopment and...Development and...DNN Platform (o...DNN Platform (o...Turning on the Web Farm Without Multiple ServersTurning on the Web Farm Without Multiple Servers
Previous
 
Next
New Post
10/16/2009 5:44 PM
 

Let me assume that currently you have a single screen, the user hits some kind of 'go' button, maybe 10 seconds later they get a reply.

The basic idea is to break this into three screens.  The user hits the go button; the code behind launches the long running process on an independant thread and immediately returns the user a new screen saying "Your request is being actioned", every couple seconds this new screen polls the server to see if the long process is done yet.  When it is (after about 10 seconds) they are sent to the results screen.  This replaces loooonnnnggg calls that clog up the server with several much shorter requests that fly through, and a long running process that goes on the side.  This article describes it http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms979200.aspx.

It's still possible that several people will demand this simultaneously, they might see the "Your request is being actioned",  page for a while.  Everyone else's (small) requests should carry on flying through.


Best wishes,
- Richard
Agile Development Consultant, Practitioner, and Trainer
www.dynamisys.co.uk
 
New Post
10/16/2009 11:56 PM
 

Wow Richard, I don't know how to thank you.  This may just be the solution we are looking for.  We'll give it a run and report back our findings.

Thanks again!

 
New Post
1/15/2010 6:23 AM
 

Turns out the polling approach certainly has its advantages.  We are using this approach for many long running scenarios.  It is not a silver bullet however.  A single worker process can only handle so much load even though requests maybe quick.  It seems a good fail-safe is to still have multiple worker processes in case one gets bogged down.  The combination of the two is really powerful however.

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDevelopment and...Development and...DNN Platform (o...DNN Platform (o...Turning on the Web Farm Without Multiple ServersTurning on the Web Farm Without Multiple Servers


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out