Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Performance and...Performance and...DNN version 6 performance on SHARED HOSTING AccountDNN version 6 performance on SHARED HOSTING Account
Previous
 
Next
New Post
10/18/2011 1:37 AM
 
I am going run to run some test on this myself today to make sure if if should start with DNN 5 or DNN 6
 
New Post
7/9/2012 1:48 PM
 

I've been running tests for 5.6.7 and 6.2

As a host/admin, 6.2 is twice as slow, often more so.

As a regular user, they are almost comparable, but I still believe 5.6.7 is faster. But as others have noted, the pages load smoother, thus giving the impression of a faster interface. The DDR mega-menu is quirky in that sometimes it doesn't render completely when impatient users click on something in the page. The result is that you can click on menu items that don't respond.

As far as system resources, 6.2 requires considerably more resources. Running 6.2 in a shared hosting service wouldn't work for us because the application often takes up 200MB of RAM, whereas 5.6.7 may take up 100 to 120MB. We have a lot of custom modules (about 50) in this application. If you are running a simple site with HTML/Text as the primary module, then you won't require so many resources.

While I like the new look and ribbon admin/host menu, I wish performance was faster.

btw, my pipe is fat and I'm using an SSD, which makes page rendering much quicker. This information is provided so you know I'm not on a slow network and running a old 386 Pentium. Remember those days?

 
New Post
7/9/2012 4:49 PM
 
Costas Zividis wrote:

For me, DNN 6 is slower than 5.6.3 but somehow smoother. But since my plan is on shared hosting, i really can't be sure about it.

 A lot of it seems to have to do with the heavy use of JavaScript in DNN 6. Particularly, the jQuery and AJAX libraries that are heavily relied on.

I don't remember how much JavaScript DNN 5 used, but it was a lot less.

While jQuery and jQuery UI, which are used in DNN 6, provide a lot of cool functionality, it has been shown to increase page load times, processing times, etc, as compared to JavaScript that is specifically tailored to a certain task. This is because the entire library has to be accessed each time a jQuery function is called.

In DNN 6.2, which is still buggy, they added options to minify the CSS and JavaScript and combine them into a single file, which will help this issue, as there will be less requests with a consolidated file, and a smaller file size, since it's minified.

If you use IIS dynamic and static compression, heavy caching, and use the 6.2.x version, after they work out the bugs, I think you'll see minimal performance decrease. They seem to be ironing out the bugs and increasing performance as they iterate on version 6.

 
New Post
7/9/2012 5:16 PM
 

In DNN 6.2, which is still buggy, they added options to minify the CSS and JavaScript and combine them into a single file, which will help this issue, as there will be less requests with a consolidated file, and a smaller file size, since it's minified.

 

 You do not have to wait to reduce the script downloads.  Check here http://www.dotnetnuke.com/Resources/W...


Best wishes,
- Richard
Agile Development Consultant, Practitioner, and Trainer
www.dynamisys.co.uk
 
New Post
7/9/2012 6:56 PM
 
Running 6.2 on shared premium account plan, i find switching Caching (heavy) from Memory to FILE (aka Disk subsystem) to help a lot on Restarts of the application (apparently due to memory pool limit, 100 mb for me dedicated).

Also when logged (admin/host) seems faster but it may be just me noticing.

All in all, 6.2 is a little slower than 5.6 but 6.2.1 from what i hear will be as good as always.

btw: is there ANY way to know the memory DNN is using when running ? From withing DNN i mean.
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Performance and...Performance and...DNN version 6 performance on SHARED HOSTING AccountDNN version 6 performance on SHARED HOSTING Account


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out