DNN 3.2.2 is a good release, as is DNN 3.1.1. DNN4 is still not quite a perfect release and is going through changes at this stage. People installing DNN4 are usually doing so because they develop in the VS 2005 space and need to run aspnet 2 - these are the key elements that people are using DNN4 for.
For those who are simply looking at an install that is good, then DNN 3.2.2 is a good build. It installs well on Win2k & Windows 2003. There don't seem to be the same amount of problems.
These are only my opinions, but it's really up to you which way to go - but for me, the bleeding edge of technology has left me somewhat scarred for the moment and I feel comfortable with builds I know work and don't make your hair too grey to install.
I've heard several stories of people having difficulty installing DNN4, and switching back to DNN 3.2.2 and it running in a very short time, so that's what makes me think that perhaps DNN 3.2.2 isn't such a bad choice afterall.
In summary- 3.2.2 is a good build on win2k & windows 2003 - so it might be worth giving that a try - it runs in medium trust which most hosters like too.
Nina Meiers
Nina Meiers My Little Website
If it's on DNN, I fix, build, deploy, support,skin, host, design, consult, implement, integrate and done since 2003.
Who am I? Just a city chic, having a crack at organic berry farming.. and creating awesome websites.