Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...DNN vs SharepointDNN vs Sharepoint
Previous
 
Next
New Post
11/17/2008 9:41 AM
 

Stuart,

Thanks for your feedback on your personal experiences with Sharepoint.  They are very helpful.  I have read the same complaint about Sharepoint that you can't turn off features that you don't have priveleges for.  The security features of DNN definitely set it apart and it appears like they are getting even better in 5.0.  I have 5.0 RC2 installed on my machine and started working with it last week.  I like some of the improvements that I have seen.

Some of the other issues I have read about with Sharepoint is that you have to manipulate the web.config to install webparts where as you can just upload a new module to DNN.  This is very beneficial since the web servers will be sitting in a DMZ that we won't be able to access directly very easily if at all.  The skinning capabilities are far better than Sharepoints master pages. I had also read that Sharepoints menu system is difficult to work with.

The only benefit I see this organization going with Sharepoint is for standardization since they are using in for an Intranet already.  This is a weak argument in my book.  Thanks for you input.

Derrick

 
New Post
11/17/2008 10:40 AM
 

The $40,000 price tag is also erroneous.  Sharepoint Services is free for intranet use, MOSS, the major server component, is far less than $40,000 when licensed by most organizations.  But this may still be a concern for some organizations and DNN may be a choice because of cost.

The main choice would be pro DNN for any public portal, pro SharePoint for any Microsoft Office collaboration work.

Jeff

 
New Post
11/17/2008 11:41 AM
 

This debate has been raging for a long time... and I must admit I am guilty of feeding it as well ( with some of my past blog posts ). The reality is that DotNetNuke and SharePoint solve different problems. And the sooner that we get people to focus on the differences rather than the similarities, the stronger DotNetNuke' market positioning will be. SharePoint is a great Intranet solution - especially in large corporate environments where there are a lot of MS Office documents and collaboration requirements. DotNetNuke is a great Extranet or Internet solution, and is also well suited to small to medium-sized Intranets where a high degree of MS Office integration is not necessary. Going forward we are planning to position DotNetNuke as the perfect compliment to your SharePoint deployment. We will achieve this by providing some SharePoint integration capabilities ( ie. the ability to expose data from SharePoint in DotNetNuke, and potentially the ability to run WebParts within DotNetNuke ). By doing this, it moves us away from an either/or decision ( ie. a zero-sum game ) and provides users and customers with a comprehensive solution to their Intranet AND Internet requirements.


My comments are my own and are offered WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Shaun Walker
http://www.siliqon.com
 
New Post
11/17/2008 11:49 AM
 

Shaun Walker wrote
 

This debate has been raging for a long time... and I must admit I am guilty of feeding it as well ( with some of my past blog posts ). The reality is that DotNetNuke and SharePoint solve different problems. And the sooner that we get people to focus on the differences rather than the similarities, the stronger DotNetNuke' market positioning will be. SharePoint is a great Intranet solution - especially in large corporate environments where there are a lot of MS Office documents and collaboration requirements. DotNetNuke is a great Extranet or Internet solution, and is also well suited to small to medium-sized Intranets where a high degree of MS Office integration is not necessary. Going forward we are planning to position DotNetNuke as the perfect compliment to your SharePoint deployment. We will achieve this by providing some SharePoint integration capabilities ( ie. the ability to expose data from SharePoint in DotNetNuke, and potentially the ability to run WebParts within DotNetNuke ). By doing this, it moves us away from an either/or decision ( ie. a zero-sum game ) and provides users and customers with a comprehensive solution to their Intranet AND Internet requirements.

Who's this Shaun Walker guy? :P

Nice to see you in the forums!! Nothing to comment here on Sharepoint as I've never seen it :->

(chief architect)


Josh Martin

 
New Post
11/17/2008 3:22 PM
 

Jeff,

The $40,000 is Microsofts price for using MOSS for Internet facing sites.  This is the cost quoted directly from the Microsoft site ( http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepointserver/FX102176831033.aspx ).

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...DNN vs SharepointDNN vs Sharepoint


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out