Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...A case for fewer portalsA case for fewer portals
Previous
 
Next
New Post
4/29/2009 9:29 PM
 

I run multiple portals in one installation for my customers.  I am careful about it though, I do not have un necessary modules installed.  If I get a client that has requirements for a a custom module or someone that will be using membership services I will put them on their own.  I have had several sites that were in a multportal installation that are now on their own, it is not hard to break them out when things look questionable.

You can run unlimited websites on a single IP address, all you need to do is add the host header name in IIS.

 
New Post
4/30/2009 6:44 AM
 

Yes.  Unfortunately portals are one of the most highly marketed but under delivered features of DotNetNuke.  Anyone on our support team can probobally tell you every single customer of ours who is running lots of portals because those are the sites that are _always_ having problems (the way that portals work encourage people to do not-smart stuff).  For example, Just yesterday one of our support guys called me over to look at a DotNetNuke site that had over 190 modules installed on it (I didn't know that many even existed!!!).
 

All in all, I think portals have their place, but it certainly isn't in production for a business critical system.  They're great for having a test bed (on a different installation from your production site), for playing around with modules, and for a few small & non-critical websites.  The only time I've worked with companies who have had anything close to a decent expierence with portals, they're either not big enough for their small number of portals to matter, or they're a highly technical developer who has a good understanding of _exactly_ what is going on under the hood and how portals really work.


 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...A case for fewer portalsA case for fewer portals


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out