Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Administration ...Administration ...Separate web and db servers - or one bigger server?Separate web and db servers - or one bigger server?
Previous
 
Next
New Post
5/29/2009 7:30 AM
 

Hi

I'm currently running www,runsaturday.com on GoGrid and from all the analytics I've run, it seems to be running out of RAM.... basically SQL Server needs 150MB and ASP.NET seems to want 150MB and together they bring the server to a thrashing state...

I'm now looking to double my available RAM allocation

Because GoGrid pricing is RAM based, for the same price I have the option of:

- a single server with 1GB RAM

- two servers with 512MB each - which I would use one for SQL2008 and one for IIS/ASP

Obviously the two server situation gives me more processing power (and probably less contentions on things like hard disk access) but I'm not sure which of these is actually the better configuration.

Does anyone have any comments or suggestions?

Thanks

Stuart

 
New Post
5/29/2009 8:11 AM
 

IMHO, strictly from a security standpoint, IIS and SQL Server should be on separate servers, preferably with a firewall between them. IIS is exposed to the world, I don't think having SQL server on that box is a great idea.

Then from a performance standpoint, both SQL and IIS are heavy memory consumers, in the case of DNN where caching is relied on heavily, this raises the chance of a conflict.

HTH



 
New Post
5/29/2009 8:25 AM
 

On two machines, you will need twice the RAM for windows, but you get two processors ...

it depends, which of these resources will be first the bottleneck


Cheers from Germany,
Sebastian Leupold

dnnWerk - The DotNetNuke Experts   German Spoken DotNetNuke User Group

Speed up your DNN Websites with TurboDNN
 
New Post
5/29/2009 11:23 AM
 

Budget aside, I think that putting sites and databases on different boxes is the way to go. You'll sleep much better with a database that's locked down and separate from the IIS box, and if you're doing e-Commerce, it is often a requirement anyway.


Eric Swanzey
www.swanzey.com
 
New Post
6/1/2009 6:32 AM
 

Thanks for the feedback.

I think I'll go for 2 boxes :)

Stuart 

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeUsing DNN Platf...Using DNN Platf...Administration ...Administration ...Separate web and db servers - or one bigger server?Separate web and db servers - or one bigger server?


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out