Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...All DNN Skins (Outsourcing)All DNN Skins (Outsourcing)
Previous
 
Next
New Post
9/12/2009 11:13 AM
 

After reading this thread, including the response from the developer and considering my own experiences I actually feel like I would consider using them if I were to outsource.

For what was asked, the work involved and what it appears the developer did to provide this service it does seem they aren't a bad mob to use.  I expect there will be very few developers that won't at some time or another have the odd disgruntled client.

From their response I do get the impression they were bending over backwards when the goal posts were changed after they accepted the project.

 
New Post
9/12/2009 2:21 PM
 

 

Here are some quick suggestions as I am both a developer and I buyer (seek outsourcing) and have used rentacoder.com.

- If you want work done by someone and specially for large projects,  you need to specify your requirements in as much detail as possible. This will deflect miscoummunications, delays, ill-feelings later in the project. Both buyer and seller needs to sign off on the requirements.

- As a developer, I want to know as much as possible of the type and amount of work I am facing so I can budget my time and resources and give a proper quote.

- Send progress reports or screenshots so your customer feels comfortable with your work so far. Doing reworks down the road is expensive for both parties.

- In the case of rentacoder.com and you're a buyer, go with sellers with high ratings even if they are more expensive. These people won't accept bids if they know it might damage their ratings. 0 rating sellers who are cheap don't care about the rating because they can always create new accounts. I used RAC twice with 0 ratings where the sellers didn't do any work, didn't respond to emails. Naturally they get low ratings but I bet they didn't care because they will just open anther account. I wanted to help the 0 rating sellers by giving them a chance to do some work and build their resume but it backfired.. twice. I decided not to repeat the mistake.

 

 


Free DNN 5.2 hosting at FreehostingWithSitebuilder.com
Lots of extra modules and skins - Your domain name or ours
 
New Post
9/20/2009 10:02 PM
 

David,

There is a difference between disgruntled and mistreated. We are not complaining about bad work we didn't like. We are voicing warnings to other developers  about a company that took our money. After hours and hours spent creating emails, charts, screen shots, and graphs, they decided they couldn't complete what we requested and stop replying to our emails, kept our money and delivered nothing! That is unethical! If this experience doesn't bother you, then by all means use their service.

We really wish there was a forum for this in DNN to save us all time and heartache by having an opportunity to review a developer before we buy (just like Rent-a-Coder). If we would have came across this review, we would have gone with someone else.

 

Tony,

I agree with your comments 100%, great addition to the conversation.

 

 
New Post
9/21/2009 3:16 AM
 

There is a difference, but there's also at least 2 sides to the story and I'm taking both into account.

You say they delivered nothing.

They say they setup a site ($50 for 13hrs). They say they also did the user add/submit side along with changes made to the requirements (amounting to some 2-3 times the original work requested on this).

Just that it seems there was a misunderstanding and the developer did try to meet your needs which either were changing, not properly outlined in the detail required, or simply during the process you found an alternative and even cheaper option.

Whatever it was... from what I've read on both sides, it just didn't convince me that the developer was simply no good.  If I were to listen to the buyer's complaints - then there's almost no decent developers out there!

 
New Post
9/22/2009 2:01 AM
 

David,

We communicated our expectations way more than what we needed. NOTHING on the site works,  they could not figure out our original request, so we took away functionality to make it easier for them. They were still unable to finish the modified (in their favor) request and stopped communicating. The work is built on their server, so nothing was ever delivered. and yes after 6 months of waiting and not returning our emails, we tried to move on to save the client.

You are getting a glimpse of what was asked. we did not post all of our documentation and emails to show how clear we communicated. that's not what this post is about. It is feedback about our experience and suggestions for alternative options.  It also is about addressing a need missing from the DNN community. The ability to review developers, so you will know if there is only one "buyer complaint".

 

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...All DNN Skins (Outsourcing)All DNN Skins (Outsourcing)


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out