Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...Very sad, what is happening in here... :(Very sad, what is happening in here... :(
Previous
 
Next
New Post
8/20/2013 11:35 AM
 
Shaun Walker wrote: to be supported by words or else there is the danger that people will come to the wrong conclusion.

I can concede that the Home page of the website is currently lacking adequate representation for the Platform - but this is because we were trying to keep the focus on the new brand and logo for the launch, and I expect that we will update the Home page with new content soon.

 

That makes perfect sense, but to sacrifice what you have started and what is now a huge success in the global market to push your new brand is a very bold move.   I understand the importance, but you now have the community worried about the future of DNN because you have shoved the DNN Platform into a dark corner.  The community is worried and you have made it harder for new people searching for DNN to find details from the source. 

In the DNN corporate office I'm sure it looks like a great move because your focused on the future of Evoke, but from the outside it looks like your walking away from DNN.

I look forward to the day the platform takes priority again on the home page.  Right now I'm seeing a downtrend for DNN.



Professional DNN Extensions, custom solutions and mobile apps since 2003.
www.OnyakTech.com
 
New Post
8/21/2013 4:22 AM
 

It's sad to see all these people whining for $99 a year proprietary software. The true value of DNN Core is that the source code is available for anyone to use and modify. This gives insurance for the future. I invest thousands of dollars each year into my websites and communities. All running DNN Core (DotNetNuke), the free version. I would not pay one dollar for Evoq og any other commercial offering. One day, in the near or far future, a big company will cast it's eyes on Evoq/DNN and buy it. Then they will integrate Evoq into their existing product portfolio and destroy the product, it's customer relationships and community along with it. We will be left out in the cold and on our own again. But, we have the source code and the right to use it. Thats the insurance we need to keep  all our investments safe. I have been in this business for 20 years. Commercial software die and disappear leaving their customers left out in the cold. Open source software evolves, or at least provides smoother transitions paths to greener fields. Think twice before you make your self dependent on proprietary web software. If you can't afford $11000 a year, then you definetly can't afford $99 either.

 
New Post
8/22/2013 5:50 AM
 
Shaun Walker wrote:

There has been concern expressed for quite a while now about the future of the open source platform. And we have tried to be VERY clear in our communication that the success of the business depends on the success of the open source platform - one is not possible without the other. I even wrote a lengthy blog in May http://www.dnnsoftware.com/blog/cid/1... which was intended to address this topic in a very comprehensive manner. That being said, with all the recent changes related to branding, the website, etc... I do understand why these questions continue to arise.

Most people have heard of and agree with the saying "actions speak louder than words". However, it is interesting how actions can often be misinterpreted. In these cases, they need to be supported by words or else there is the danger that people will come to the wrong conclusion.

I am bringing this up because in the rebranding / website overhaul, a LOT of care and attention was put into the goal of trying to give the DNN Platform more visibility, better representation, etc... than it had on the the previous website. For example, it was no mistake that it got its own top level navigation menu option named "Platform".  Nor was it a mistake that a whole new set of "platform" content pages were created to emphasize the value and power of the DNN Platform.  All of these "actions" were intended to demonstrate our commitment to the open source platform - so it is interesting how people are coming to the opposite conclusion. I can concede that the Home page of the website is currently lacking adequate representation for the Platform - but this is because we were trying to keep the focus on the new brand and logo for the launch, and I expect that we will update the Home page with new content soon.

 

Hi Shaun I would like to come up with a suggestion - how about you put the forum link on the home page, instead of nested under a couple of menus that don't have dropdowns, but you have to try and navigate through the site.  I think that could help people think there is more to the site than just the commercial products. 

I have had several emails from people anxious about what's happening with DNN, sales have dropped, developers are dropping out of the eco system, developers are being employed by DNN who were once contributors to the project at an open source level, but now sadly they have been gobbled up by DNN and I can see why - they are quite talented people, and all I can think of, excuse me being cynical is that it's incredibly clever and almost stroke of brilliance to whittle away at those 'annoying freeloaders' who expect something for nothing, given that many of the contributors are employed by DNN so it sort of pays them back for the their efforts.  

I honestly can't see the reason that DNN would want to even keep the open source project going - it doesn't make commercial sense, given that they've bought up, bought out, sold out, sold off, split up, dropped modules and developers and employed so many now.  

I mean lets face it at 11k per year for the software that's an amount I can't quantify with 'value' for the community project.   It's poles apart. And if you don't have people like myself or others in the forums here who have posted concerns, there is a larger market to DNNCorp who now have the infrastructure and staff to handle it - so in plain English, the community is more like a liability because we do not tend to bring a value proposition to the table.  I know some developers who say straight out that they will not commit code to the project any more on the basis that they don't want to 'fund' the commercial project because that is the sentiment - right or wrong - that is the feeling of many.

I read your blogs, and I try so hard to not to be suspicious or cynical, really I do because I've been as close this project now for a decade, but I can see that there is no competition, even for a store, there are people who ask me about modules and what they should use and if 'that developer is going to sell out to DNN and they can't get the module any more' and developers who are seeing incredible drops in sales and I have no idea what to say - it's not as if I'm privvy to anything special, but when I come to the website now, for all intent purposes, this does not look like an open source project, nor does it feel like one any more and it's being turned into something like stackoverflow. 

I saw some push back when DNN bought snowcovered, but when Active forums got sold, and then word that it was being split for the commercial project, and nothing done on Active Forums after people had invested thousands of dollars on the modules, people get suspicious because you are in fact affecting their business model by taking their market away, whether its by developer and module acquisition or lack of confidence in the product now where developers abandon DNN because there are better projects to support.

Actions do speak louder than words you are correct, and alas, we're reading alot of words and nothing else.

I do not expect a favourable response to this given that I know your feelings towards me in the past, but this project is very important to me as well - I, along with many others have invested a decade of commitment in our own ways  and the credibility of DNN and it's words is somewhat fractured with the primary support and voices coming from 'within DNN'  but not a lot of positive feeling from elsewhere, unless of course you are a 'partner' who has sold your products because us 'freeloaders  opensource users' don't count or come across as having any value at all.  I can't tell you how frustrating it is to be one high value open source solutions experts with 10 years experience and done thousands of projects to not even quality to apply for 'partner' level because I use the open source project - I'll leave that discussion for another day!!

I thought I should share some of the sentiment of many others who feel insecure about their business decisions module development wise, and members of the public who wonder if, firstly the community project really is coming to a halt, and secondly, will the developers still be there because it's not giving the public that warm and fuzzy feeling.

Then there is also the question to be asked - why do you care Shaun? Why do you see the need to have the open source project anyway?  The focus of DNN is now "Show me the money" so where, in the big picture does the open source community come into it?  I'm really trying to understand where open source has any benefit except for Microsoft to be able to pitch against open source php.    I can only think it's some arrangement, paid perhaps, I can't work it out as to why the project remains open source except for being 'token open source project' to give someone the warm and fuzzies - I guess I'll never know.  From the actions and behaviour, the concept of 'doing for the good of the world' is not going down with the outsiders.

I think you'll find my questions are on the lips of quite a few people because there is this incredible gap between how DNN presents itself now, to possibly what is discussed in the boardroom about your own 'perception'  - you know  - sometimes you can get shopblind looking inward all the time and discussing with yourselves on what others think of you (by that I mean DNN - not personally you Shaun).

And the site looks fantastic but it's hell to navigate - so confusing - but it looks really smart - I think visually it's one of the best and I love looking at it.

Anyway - Shaun - there are some of my questions to you - I would love have something I could tell those who contact me looking for answers because I am unsure what to reply.  Any positive feedback or response would be much appreciated but sure as hell not expected - and this is said tongue in cheek because I have really said my piece today and this thread has upset me because I know many of the names and some have been here for years.

Nina

 


Nina Meiers My Little Website
If it's on DNN, I fix, build, deploy, support,skin, host, design, consult, implement, integrate and done since 2003.
Who am I? Just a city chic, having a crack at organic berry farming.. and creating awesome websites.
 
New Post
8/22/2013 12:15 PM
 
I think Nina's response is well written and well thought out - well done Nina, I think you've made a very good point and you've been an evangelist for the platform for many years, so I hope your standing adds weight to the conversation.

Let’s not forget the average exit for VC's is on average 5 years and VC's generally do not invest for the greater good and that warm fuzzy feeling. Once DNN became a corporation and received VC investment, it was clear the goal was to monetize the platform (and that's not a bad thing, there are many people in the company that have invested a good chunk of their lives to build it, so good on them), but I believe that can be accomplished without cannibalizing the ecosystem that made it all possible.

From the outside it would appear the ecosystem grew to a decent enough level where the wheat began to separate from the chaff and the dedicated, well respected and committed members who built wonderful modules and systems (ala Snowcovered) floated to the surface. Once that happened and the VC money came in, DNN Corp. swooped in and bought them all out (not all of course, those like Chris Onyak are still independent - and thanks Chris for adding your voice to the conversation). The DNN Corp is now consists of a dream team of seasoned developers and that's awesome, I have no doubt the DNN Corp will be very profitable, but as Nina points out, the ecosystem and the common man does not appear to be part of that plan.

Shaun & co. have done a wonderful job building the platform to where it is today and I believe they have the best of intentions for the platform, I mean they could walk away from it entirely and that would be the end of it (unless someone or a group of people step forward to run it as a true a community project), I mean truly they're the ones developing it... The platform itself is just a means to an end and DNN Corp will not devalue their social and content modules by selling them À la carte at a cut rate, so unless a serious influx of good developers join the ecosystem and are allowed to sell competing products very soon (and encouraged to do so), then I can only see this becoming a slow and painful process - death by a thousand paper cuts.

So what to do? DNN Corp must make money, the platform must continue to grow or die and the ecosystem has been gutted. Seems to me like we need to focus on the ecosystem - restarted and rebooting the ecosystem. DNN has some cash, why not start a few programming competitions? Sponsor some community based modules? Create the bounty system for module creation like I mentioned in an earlier post.

That's my two cents in any case. I hope the company starts realizing that this isn't just coming from whining, leaches who refuse to pay for anything, this is coming from people who have lived and breathed the product from day one and don't want it to come crashing down around them - which really would be a shame. Get MS in on the conversation and ask for their help. What we're talking about there is not just abandoning the DNN platform, but the MS platform it runs on. Guys, this is serious and I hope you're taking that way. It's only because we've grown to love DNN as much as you have that we're even talking about this in a public forum rather than just moving on....

TJ
 
New Post
8/22/2013 12:33 PM
 
I also too do like the new website, it really is a pleasure to look at.  Nice job!

I think because of the makeover allot of things have gone missing or are presented in a different way which causes much confusion. Especially the forums and the online store which is crucial to making the community feel 100% part of the DotnetNuke family.

The first thing that caught me off guard was the domain name change. It used to be www.dotnetnuke.com and is now http://www.dnnsoftware.com which to me stated that the focus has changed from providing a platform to providing software built on the platform, which I am sure many interpreted in the same way.
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...Very sad, what is happening in here... :(Very sad, what is happening in here... :(


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out