Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...4.5.3 caching problem4.5.3 caching problem
Previous
 
Next
New Post
6/14/2007 6:37 PM
 

How does a web garden help you to utilize more CPU?  The only time I can think of that it might help is if you are bottlenecked in the request pool, which is pretty hard to do without running the CPU up.

If you have large uploads or other processes that will require requests to run for relatively long periods of time then you might have a reason for using a web garden, but there is a trade-off there too.
This is because if you start running multiple worker processes in the same application pool then you are going to be more likely to run into contention on the outside resources like shared files.

Another reason to run a web garden would be to have redundant processes in case one becomes deadlocked.  ASP.Net already handles deadlocked worker processes by recycling them automatically, and if you are wanting real isolation between different applications then they should be in their own application pools.

Long story short.  The trade-offs for running in a web garden are likely not worth it in most web applications.


DotNetNuke Modules from Snapsis.com
 
New Post
6/14/2007 7:45 PM
 

That's basically it.  Hence the focus on web farm implementations vs. web gardens.  Thanks.


Scott Willhite, Co-Founder DNN

"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly... what is essential is invisible to the eye. "
~ Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

 
New Post
6/15/2007 1:15 AM
 

Thanks. John, the mulitple application pools is what we tried several months ago...remember? I thought that might a good idea but I am not complaining about performance at this moment. To be honest, I am very happy with DNN as it runs now on my site.

 
New Post
6/15/2007 7:35 AM
 

Right Mariette.  I wasn't talking about multiple application pools pointing at the same DNN instance, which also doesn't work.  I should have made that more clear.

Although, I also had the same question Richard posed earlier in this thread about Web Gardens being like Web Farms. So I've been looking at the code and it just might be possible for a Web Garden to work if EnableWebFarmSupport is set to true in the web.config.

There is still going to be the problem with multiple instances of the scheduler kicking off since they are all the on the same server, but that might not be that hard to fix.

 


DotNetNuke Modules from Snapsis.com
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...4.5.3 caching problem4.5.3 caching problem


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out