I haven't really seen evidence of TRUE workflow. Essentially, what I means is that allow of the workflow solutions involve content changes with their own versions of what would be text/HTML content. However users can effectively end-run the entire process by adding a FAQ module for instance, and bypassing a restriction that would be need to ensure quality control. To me, anyway, workflow has come out as a need to ensure QA.

I really don't understande why they would go to the effort to use a module that was separated from the macro process of editing a site. It seems to me a bit useless if you're allowing content managers the ability to edit ANY kind of content without going through an approval process. I haven't found 1 company who has a solution to this.

I actually like the stuff from Engage, but they mentioned on the phone today that there is workflow so long as you only use their own module. Now I'm not certain I can use DNN at all in order to meet my requirements.

Enterprise forms (longnhi.com) allows you to use the Enterprise forms workflow engine for the core Text/HTML module as well as for the core Announcements module.

In addition ... you can use it internally in Enterprise forms ...

Does this mean that I have to uninstall every other module in DNN to ensure a content manager does not try to use it and modify the web site? If I purchase a module by another 3rd party, will it be covered by this product when someone tried to add, edit, or remove it from the DNN website?