Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...Opinion: DotNetNuke and ASPDNSF ML/DNNOpinion: DotNetNuke and ASPDNSF ML/DNN
Previous
 
Next
New Post
3/9/2009 5:50 PM
 

Please allow me to interject.  I'll preface this post by stating that Chris' license was purchased through a reseller (to whom we sell at a significant discount), who, according to our reseller policies, is supposed to provide 100% of the support to end user.  We weren't obligated to provide one iota of support whatsoever.  If you want to question our dedication to our customers and the quality of our software, please consider this:

  • We asked the customer on day one to do a clean install without any third party modules so we could troubleshoot, which was outright refused.  Against our better judgement we continued to troubleshoot there installation.
  • We spent nearly a hundred hours tracking down an intermittent issue in the DNN framework that had nothing to do with our software
  • 95% of the issues reported to us could not be reproduced except on their production site (not even on a staging site on the same server)
  • We spent additional time tracking down registration issues that were caused by a third party URL Rewrite module
  • All the while we were tracking down issues (again, many of which were either not our code, or could not be replicated by anyone else in the world), Chris was send us email messages full of A) idle threats, and B) offers to have his company fix our software for a price 
  • In regards to "poorly ported spaghetti code," Chris never purchased source code from us, which means he is either lying or stealing.  There is no other explanation, as there is almost no code available in the non-source version of ML/DNN.

All told, we gave Chris' company nearly $15,000 worth of FREE support time, on a discounted license that we weren't even supposed to be supporting, troubleshooting issues that couldn't be replicated except in conjunction with their production site that had all kinds of other "things" running on it.  Yes, we did find a few issues in our software (no one has written bug free software to date), but in comparison the time it took to resolve those was minor, and we were happy to fix them.  When we finally said enough is enough, we even took the time to set up a clean site, fully patched, AND migrate Chris' data into it for them.  At some point however, Chris has to take responsibility for Chris' specific deployment.

Just to clarify a couple other points as well...  Mr. Wylie spent a considerable amount of time name dropping all of the important people that agreed with him on how poor the platform was...  So I made calls to some C-level executives myself, as if that is the consensus I would certainly want to know about it.  We are never averse to constructive criticism.  We wouldn't have 10,000 sites running our software if we were...  Anyways, it turns out in one case, and sent over an apology for his misunderstanding.  In another instance, the naysayer happened to be a level 1 support technician...

Anyways, I am sure Chris will be back at any second to dispute my post.  I have no desire to sit around and argue publicly and waste everyone else's time, but I did feel it important to add the other side of this story.  We have always ALWAYS gone out of our way to help customers whenever it is even remotely reasonable to do so, and even sometimes when it is not.

 

 
New Post
3/9/2009 7:20 PM
 

Dan, Hi Nina here, while it's good to see that you've responded to the forums here, and obviously closely connected to the product, it's always a juggle to make people happy - I can tell you that wholeheartedly and I don't even write code..

I need to ask you a couple of questions, now that I have you here, and obviously it's drawing some interestd, comments, comparisons and gripes..(which you'll always have no matter what you do in life)

You mention that you have tracked down a hundred hours of issues relating to the DNN framework - isn't this part of software development processes? I'm not a coder, so I might be off track in my assumptions, we've only done literally thousands and thousands of skins, hundreds, if not at least a thousand installs of DNN over the last 6 years and we know, based on our experience of DNN, pretty much when an error occurs, unless it's on something new, where to look, mind you that's when it's on our servers, but we do not have the development infrastructure in place that I would think a company like yours would have simply for the fact there is no need.

It seems perhaps the reason you would have given Chris a discount on your offerings was to get your foot in the door with another developer which, I have also done, at times, given away alot of my time, knowledge and resources, to help get people over the line.  Most of the time its worked and we've moved on to have great relationships but other times it's not, and we have to call that 'cost of business' and the risk we decided to to take when we embarked on the opportunity.  I know very well that my request to have access your product for testing and trying out was knocked back because your company didn't feel that my company matched the calibre or requirements to use, promote or partner with your business, most likely because I was using Catalook and still am.

What I see which is the part that is the sticking point for me is the lack of actual happy clients, after at least 2? years? I think it's two, if not 3, where I remember in a thread how someone from ASPDNSF completely ripped into people who stated that Catalook or some other sofware might have been just as good alternative, and the comments, I might add where not becoming of a company trying to get their foot in the door.  The thread implied that everyone else was second rate, not a serious player and you had done thousands of sites.  I cannot deny the fact you've done thousands of sites, but where are the DNN ones?  This is what we're talking about.

Your comment here - "We wouldn't have 10,000 sites running our software if we were."  these are NOT DNN sites, this is the point.. it's like telling me it's simply fantastic for everyone who isn't running a DNN site.

I have read so many posts here that alarm me, and now we have ASPDNSF starting to step in and start publicly commenting on the client.  Believe me, when I tell you this, it's not winning you friends.  It never has, it never will and lays a visible legacy on people who search the forums about how you handle unhappy clients.  I have had them too you know, and guess what - they whinge about my FREE stuff.. things I do out of my own time, that might not be perfect, and I have hung out to dry on some occasions.

People have posted here because they are concerned, they have invested, as an off the shelf product, nearly 1500.00(US and in AU it would be close to 2,800) before we get started - that's before they have a relationship with their clients, and now, when I read about all the work that you have done to help Chris Wylie, and you've given him 15,000 of freebies or whatever you call it, and others who have spent months and months trying to support your product but can't get things running, something really does require revisiting.

Sure I use Catalook, I have never promoted it's beauty, it's not a pretty out of the box solution, but it works, and has worked for years, and the biggest gripe we hear is it's complicated and ugly , NOT that it doesn't work, NOT that people have waited for one year to get something finished, NOT that overpriced NOT that the service is bad and never have I seen, no matter how pain in the butt the client may be, a nasty word made against a client in public, as I've seen here and it simply doesn't look good.  But then again, perhaps the expectation of the product supplied by Catalook is less because it cost less in the first place, I don't know.

I personally think you need to do a couple of things.. Talk to Chris offline, because it doesn't take long for things to get personal and they do when people are frustrated, feeling ignored and disappointed.  I don't think that Chris's comments are perfect, but it does show, along with the other threads here, you have some seriously unhappy people.  

I also think may need to reassess how you deliver this product while it has problems, or perhaps consider selling a completely deployed build - ready to go with a list of do's and dont's - that way you will be in control of the build.  While it's not a standard thing you do, it can eliminate lots of problems. I do alot of 'build and deploy' sites for clients and send them a ready to go site because we know DNN, and you know your product, so while you think perhaps it's going to take longer, the 15k of support probably won't be there and you will have a good record of your own instances and be able to verify that at hand over, it did work as expected.

I think DNN corp guys have been a little naiive promoting your product as they do, stating that it's the be all end all of ecommerce, because at the rate things are being posted here, it's the be all end of relationships between your customers and the product, when it really should not be. Outside DNN it does stand on it's own, it's a sterling, off the shelf product and I think that perhaps people are expecting, for the money, that same result as an off the shelf solution for DNN and it's not working.

Personally, if I had purchased the product, and then been asked to do a clean install without third party modules, I would have questioned it.. I most likely would have done so, to resolve a problem but I would have given you access or a list of the modules I'm using for you to test, NOT me - I'm not a beta tester of your software for 1500.00 and my time to find your problems.  But you asked someone who's expecting your product to work like the 10,000 others you've built, and it doesn't.   If we can't use third party modules, then why buy it? Why not just put it on a build of it's own and connect users to DNN instead?  I would be really hesistant if such an advanced product such as yours now required me to test all my modules first means I'm beta testing your product again, and not that I don't believe we need people like this, I'm not expecting me to have to troubleshoot your product when I've been told it's the best product around.

Can you see how easy it is for people to be frustrated and annoyed.  Sure I use Catalook, yes there have been problems, but I'm always wanting other products to succeed as it helps DNN get a better name, more acceptance.. yada yada - you know the story. I really hope you can provide a DNN solution that looks at good as your non DNN ones, AND we have a showcase of sites that were built using DNN and ASPDNSF from people who you are marketing to - It seems most of those who purchase your product are marketers and resellers - they know their clients, they buy what they feel is a quality product, they aren't looking for a cheap solution and are feeling let down.

Thanks for showing your presence here - it's not comfortable to be in the line of fire and my comments here were not to give you are hard time at all. I do see things from both sides of the fence you know as we all know nothing is black and white with software.

Nina Meiers


Nina Meiers My Little Website
If it's on DNN, I fix, build, deploy, support,skin, host, design, consult, implement, integrate and done since 2003.
Who am I? Just a city chic, having a crack at organic berry farming.. and creating awesome websites.
 
New Post
3/9/2009 7:59 PM
 

Nina.. asking a customer to remove or disabling modules for troubleshooting purposes is a valid request. As a developer I need to know if some other software is interferring with mine, Specially when some DNN modules are installed as asp.net http modules which can wreck havoc in everything if they are not developed properly. A url rewriter can be one of them. It's like I ask someone to turn off their firewall if my software is unable to connect to another network.. I need to know that the firewall is not blocking the connection. If my dnn module works on a clean DNN installation but not when other modules are installed then it *could* be a problem with either mine or one of the others. But I do know it's a problem with two or more DNN modules not playing nice together or with a bug in DNN. The idea is to begin a process of elimination and narrow down the variables until you find the culprit. This *can* be a time consuming and expensive process which will frustrate the people involved.

(I am speaking from a technical point of view and I am not taking sides)

 
New Post
3/9/2009 9:55 PM
 

Before co-founding DotNetNuke Corp., I had my own consulting company which assisted in the conversion of the ASPDNSF ML product to the DotNetNuke platform.  During that conversion, I necessarily became intimately familiar with ASPDNSF and how it worked.  Like most ecommerce products with any significant capability, it is not trivial to setup the product.  That is just one of the many issues facing anyone who wishes to setup an ecommerce site.  It requires a certain level of understanding to get the product configured to your specific needs - in some cases it may even require a level of customization.  That is not any different than my experience with the other DNN ecommerce products.

Knowing my own experience in software development, it is not unusual to try and eliminate other points of conflict in an install.  In fact I have even had Microsoft Tech Support go so far as to ask me to do a complete uninstall and re-install of their products (both Visual Studio and MS Office).  When you run into situations where you have trouble reproducing the issue in your own test environment, you will often ask the customer to take sometimes extraordinary steps to try and isolate the issue.  That is not an unusual request.

As for DNN ML sites - there are a number of them that I know of that show what can be done with the product including ZoneDiet.com, Left-brain.com, uncommongames.com or even store.rzim.org.  Each of these sites shows different levels of integration and customization that is possible depending on the skill of the site developer.

DNN Corp has never stated, nor will we ever, that ASPDNSF is the be all and end all of ecommerce.  We do think their product fills an important niche in the DNN ecosystem and are glad to have them using our platform, just as we are for the hundreds of other vendors out there.  Having used the product and seen other sites and other vendors who are using it successfully, I know that it does work.  It is not without it's bugs and even a few idiosyncracies - that is not unusual.  What I do know is that like many vendors, ASPDNSF works hard to keep updating it's product fixing any bugs that have been discovered.  What I find objectionable is that the forums are being used to hash out a customer service dispute which does not aid the community, the customer or the vendor.  Unless you are privy to all of the communications and efforts expended, then there is no way to know the whole truth.  The customer has one story and the vendor has another.  That is why we seldom allow threads like this to continue, they often, as this one has, devolve into a flame war where the vendor is unable to respond.

Given that both sides have had a chance to respond, I am locking this thread so that it can roll off the forum home page and we can all find a more constructive discussion.


Joe Brinkman
DNN Corp.
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...Opinion: DotNetNuke and ASPDNSF ML/DNNOpinion: DotNetNuke and ASPDNSF ML/DNN


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out