Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...You have to be kiddingYou have to be kidding
Previous
 
Next
New Post
3/1/2009 8:22 PM
 

Cathal:
Unfortunately, I am one of many that was unaware of the core wiki initiative.  I am highly pleased to hear that it is already on the table.  That's awesome!

Oliver Hine:
The trunk will probably not ever be opened up.  That is a form of necessary control that has kept the DNN core as stable as it has been up to this point.  That being said, we probably had a greater chance of that happening before the funding occured.  However, I am not convinced that having the trunk being open would be a good thing either way.  I favor the side of security and stability, while at the same time, I see your point at people being able to see pending changes.  (I have seen you make a pretty good argument for it in another thread.)


Will Strohl

Upendo Ventures Upendo Ventures
DNN experts since 2003
Official provider of the Hotcakes Commerce Cloud and SLA support
 
New Post
3/2/2009 9:50 PM
 

Will Strohl wrot

The trunk will probably not ever be opened up.  That is a form of necessary control that has kept the DNN core as stable as it has been up to this point.  That being said, we probably had a greater chance of that happening before the funding occured.  However, I am not convinced that having the trunk being open would be a good thing either way.  I favor the side of security and stability, while at the same time, I see your point at people being able to see pending changes.  (I have seen you make a pretty good argument for it in another thread.)

Exposing the trunk in a read only fashion wouldn't create any additional security risk (the source is already published). It would only promote testing & development on the alpha versions from the community. It's not something for the faint hearted as things will blow up, but it's the only way to get the latest bits into the hands of the people that really matter.

 
New Post
3/3/2009 12:12 PM
 

Will Strohl wrote

The trunk will probably not ever be opened up.  That is a form of necessary control that has kept the DNN core as stable as it has been up to this point.  That being said, we probably had a greater chance of that happening before the funding occured.  However, I am not convinced that having the trunk being open would be a good thing either way.  I favor the side of security and stability, while at the same time, I see your point at people being able to see pending changes.  (I have seen you make a pretty good argument for it in another thread.)

Of course it will be better! I have spent hours yesterday installing legacy skins because the darn batch installer is BROKEN in 5.0.1. Very very frustrating. Frustrating because I reported the problem in 5.0.0. I used the repackskin kindly developed by a volunteer in 5.0.0. Now this tool doesn't help in 5.0.1.

I have asked several times to release beta's or RC's and I got non convincing replies. I am going to post a separate post because I am actually pissed off now.

What are the security concerns? Please explain.

 

 

 
New Post
3/4/2009 10:46 AM
 

You stated this in your other thread Salama... So the fix went wrong apparently.... c'est la vie you should have stuck with 4.9.2 for your needs.

So far I have not seen a new issue with steps for reproduction in support.dotnetnuke.com (nb you existing issue will not be reopened), if we don't get a new issue it won't be fixed for 5.0.2 either. If you can supply a fix yourself then that will speed up the process.

Sometimes things go wrong and you just need to fix the fixes.



Alex Shirley


 
New Post
3/4/2009 12:24 PM
 

With all do respect. My post was about the ambience that has been layed out over the last several weeks (months?) by the ambiguity in the announcements. I suspect that those of you that are embedded in the business side of DNN do not have the perspective of the audience. What has been posted does not leave a very comfortable feeling. That is a fact. It has just left questions and generated some fear of what the heck is going on and especially, what is to come. We have been waiting to make CMS decisions and had DNN on the top of the list. The announcement left the stated that the PE documentation was going to be "comprehensive".  This implies that the CE was not going to be. A red X on the comparison helped with that too. 

This thread may be helping to alleviate some of that but only because people like you respond.

The first I heard of $2,000 was this week. When I clicked on the Purchase icon it presented a form. In my 20 some years of experience that form means... $10,000.00 to get started. 

FYI, I buy all the books. Just got 5.0 last week. I paid for many videos. I like to keep the community going and am very willing to support it.

 

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeOur CommunityOur CommunityGeneral Discuss...General Discuss...You have to be kiddingYou have to be kidding


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out