cathal connolly wrote:
As for new wiki articles, it requires a moderator to move a draft to a published page. After that moderators are also required to approve page edits. In time we'll easily be able to identify trusted users and they will no longer require moderation, but at present we've had more spam created by users than real articles so this is necessary.
Ok. FYI, this seemed to go up right away uncategorized and untouched.
cathal connolly wrote:
BTW your wiki entry uses html - can I ask you to not use html tags -this wiki instance is a true wiki so you use wiki markup. Whilst it allows some html (it strips some dangerous html), by adding markup that controls appearance you complicate things e.g. when the site redesign happens we can easily change the wiki markup css and all articles will look approriate, whereas yours (at present) might not.
The main reason I wanted to edit the content in fact. I stopped when when things started looking buggy.
cathal connolly wrote:
as for categorisation, the moderator will assign your entry to the necessary categories when they moderate it. Unfortunately in this version of the wiki, creating tags and assigning to tags are handled by the same permission - we don't at this time want to allow all users to create tags, so we're forced into this. I believe the next release will resolve this (and many other quirks)
How might we make category suggestions to lighten the work for the moderators?