Products

Solutions

Resources

Partners

Community

Blog

About

QA

Ideas Test

New Community Website

Ordinarily, you'd be at the right spot, but we've recently launched a brand new community website... For the community, by the community.

Yay... Take Me to the Community!

Welcome to the DNN Community Forums, your preferred source of online community support for all things related to DNN.
In order to participate you must be a registered DNNizen

HomeHomeArchived Discus...Archived Discus...Developing Under Previous Versions of .NETDeveloping Under Previous Versions of .NETASP.Net 2.0ASP.Net 2.0Slow startup time after bin folder updateSlow startup time after bin folder update
Previous
 
Next
New Post
12/3/2008 7:27 AM
 

Hello.
Im having a hard time and been banging my head in the wall.
I want to learn how to develop new modules and have a new WAP project setup that generates one small (17kb) dll in the DNN bin folder. 

The problem is that every time I compile my WAP project the startup time in the webbrowser takes 20 seconds.
20 sec is a long time and it's really frustrating when trial and error testing.
The module works fine when it's loaded. No error. 

The problem as I understand is that the module dll is moved to the bin folder.
Net2 framework then updates all the dll in the bin folder, the first time the site is loaded and this takes time.

Im running DNN 4.9 & Vs2008.
I have a new DNN installation and a new module created with the "Starter kit template".
We tried the same setup on another computer and have the same 20 sec startup time after the module been compiled.

I wonder if there a way around the 20 sec delay?

Is everyone developing in DNN having this problem or is it just me?
What is your statup time of a new module project ?

Best regards,
Henrik


 
 

 
New Post
12/3/2008 7:30 AM
 

it all depends on the speed of your pc i guess


Erik van Ballegoij, Former DNN Corp. Employee and DNN Expert

DNN Blog | Twitter: @erikvb | LinkedIn: Erik van Ballegoij on LinkedIn

 
New Post
12/3/2008 8:20 AM
 

Sorry. I chould have spec my computer.

I have a dell Xps laptop with dualcore T7200 2Ghz Cpu, 2Gb Ram, Xp Pro, ISS 5.1.
It a pretty fast computer.

It feels like 20 sec is realy slow and the module development workflow is a pain.
Is this normal?

// Henrik

 
New Post
12/3/2008 10:25 AM
 

Mine is Core 2 Duo 6700 @ 2.66GHz with 8Gb on Vista 64.

Running against install version of DNN 4.9 with the SQL db on a separate box.

Startup time from recompile of module is 24 to 27 seconds. Module does no db loading on startup.

 


 
New Post
12/3/2008 2:10 PM
 

Thanks Declan - I guess your the project is also a WAP where the changes is in the dll ?
Ok. So I'm not the only one with a slow workflow :)
 
If this is the way it is, it feels like a big problem?
If I'm going to develop a new module for a customer and every build takes 20-27 sec just to start, it will take a long time to finish and validate.
It also alot of time wasted in the project where the programmer sitting and waiting. 

Is there no way to develop new modules that is more effective?
It feels like I missed something?

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeArchived Discus...Archived Discus...Developing Under Previous Versions of .NETDeveloping Under Previous Versions of .NETASP.Net 2.0ASP.Net 2.0Slow startup time after bin folder updateSlow startup time after bin folder update


These Forums are dedicated to discussion of DNN Platform and Evoq Solutions.

For the benefit of the community and to protect the integrity of the ecosystem, please observe the following posting guidelines:

  1. No Advertising. This includes promotion of commercial and non-commercial products or services which are not directly related to DNN.
  2. No vendor trolling / poaching. If someone posts about a vendor issue, allow the vendor or other customers to respond. Any post that looks like trolling / poaching will be removed.
  3. Discussion or promotion of DNN Platform product releases under a different brand name are strictly prohibited.
  4. No Flaming or Trolling.
  5. No Profanity, Racism, or Prejudice.
  6. Site Moderators have the final word on approving / removing a thread or post or comment.
  7. English language posting only, please.
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out
What is Liquid Content?
Find Out